Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

MOST FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Where and what, is the “Great Pacific Garbage Patch?

Why aren’t there any satellite photos of the “Garbage Patch?”

Where is all the plastic coming from ?

What types of plastic are causing the problem?

How long does it take plastic to break down?

What is the difference between photo degradation and bio degradation?

What effect is plastic having on marine life?

Are there solutions?

Can’t we clean up the plastic in the Gyre?

How does this affect me? Is my health at risk?

What are the next steps on Algalita’s Agenda?

Where and what, is the “Great Pacific Garbage Patch?

The “Great Pacific Garbage Patch” is an area of high concentration of debris in the northeastern corner of the vortex, or center, of North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. It is also known as the “Eastern Pacific Garbage Patch” because it is theorized there is another “Garbage Patch” on the western side of the Gyre. It is not a “patch” or a floating “island” of debris, but it is actually a “plastic soup” where the plastic is distributed throughout the water column. The eastern area of the vortex is characterized by relatively consistent high pressure and little wind becoming a convergent area or accumulation zone. Algalita’s first study area in this corner of the vortex, which showed high concentrations of plastic in the surface (Manta) samples, spanned across hundreds of miles, although we still don't know the precise size. As the area of study expanded, so did the size of “Garbage Patch” to roughly twice the original size. Although the “Garbage Patch” is the area of highest concentration of debris studied, the ORV Alguita and her research team have collected ocean water samples over thousands of square miles from 18N to 42N and 117W to the International Date Line (180W) and found significant quantities of marine debris, of which plastic was highly predominant. Every sample analyzed, to date, has had plastic in it.

Why aren’t there any satellite photos of the “Garbage Patch?”

When seen from above plastic appears as confetti on the ocean’s surface, among an occasional piece of derelict fishing gear. Many of the pieces of plastic are not seen because of the fluid dynamics of the ocean, stirring the plastic just below the surface by the wave action created by the wind and currents. Some of the floating plastic becomes fouled by plant growth or organisms attaching to it, which make it sink below the surface. Certain types of plastics are heavier than the water and sink or to the ocean floor. This cannot be captured in satellite photos.

Where is all the plastic coming from ?

It is estimated that land-based sources are responsible for up to 80% of marine debris. About 65 % of this, or essentially half of all found in the ocean, comes from consumer used plastics that have not been disposed of properly. These non-point (diffuse) sources include trash that comes from further inland, carelessly discarded and carried by the wind and/ or down streams and rivers flowing into the sea. Heavy storms can contribute to the immense volume of debris via flood or swift moving water. Additionally both intentional and unintentional plastic debris “lost” in the ocean by cargo and passenger ships and the fishing industry compounds the problem.
Land based point sources include plastic manufacturers and fabricators who inadvertently spill “nurdles” that ultimately find their way to the oceans. A “nurdle” is a pre-production plastic pellet. They are chemically produced in a few facilities and then shipped to processors where they are melted and shaped into many types of consumer products, such as toothbrushes, and non consumer products, such as handles for crates or packaging materials.

What types of plastic are causing the problem?

The majority of our samples collected in the water column at one, ten, thirty, and one hundred meter depths, contain primarily low-density polyethylene, expanded styrene (Styrofoam), polypropylene, and PET (polyethylene terephthalate). There are others, but these are the most predominant.

How long does it take plastic to break down?

No one can say with certainty how long plastics will last in the environment. Depending on the type of plastic, its size and shape, its method of manufacture, the length of time to degrade can be hundreds of years or longer. So many factors are at play, such as temperature, amount of sunlight, water chemistry, agitation, and the surface area of the material, each situation is different. What degrades in a landfill or a municipal waste treatment plant digester does not necessarily degrade in the ocean. In any case, some of the plastic that currently exists in the ocean appears to have been there for decades. One euphemism stated by some is “That plastic, like diamonds, is forever.”

What is the difference between photo degradation and bio degradation?

Photo degradation refers to the action of ultraviolet radiation and solar heat on plastic. In the absence of special additives (many plastics contain UV filters specifically designed to resist this natural process), the plastic weakens and breaks into pieces. This is a physical change, not a chemical one.
Bio degradation occurs when living organisms transform the chemical bonds of the plastic. In current scientific understanding, biodegradation plays a very limited role in the environmental fate of plastics. While there have been preliminary, isolated reports of specific terrestrial microorganisms that can “digest” certain types of plastic, in general….plastic is NOT “digestible”.

What effect is plastic having on marine life?

Large pieces of plastic can kill by entrapment, suffocation and drowning. Smaller pieces can be ingested, causing choking or intestinal blockage. In some cases, starvation occurs because the plastic makes the animal feel full without having had any nourishment. Plastic consumed by marine life appears to either pass through the digestive tract intact, if it is small enough, or remains in the animal, blocking the intestinal tract, causing death. When the animal dies, the plastic is either released to be eaten again, or it is swallowed by a predator eating the plastic-ridden prey. In the case of seabirds, many of them simply perish on shore with their stomach contents eventually being the only thing to remain.

Accumulation of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) on plastic, and the resulting effects on marine life when this plastic is ingested is a topic of much discussion in the scientific community. The term POP (persistent organic pollutant) is a description of organic materials which do not completely dissolve in water and do not degrade into harmless materials in a relatively short amount of time. Examples include PCB’s (polychlorinated biphenyls) and other materials that resist degradation. Many POPs are proven carcinogens. Other POPs contribute to other problems with marine life, such as reproductive issues due to hormone disruption. Recent conferences (2008) attended by various groups indicate the need for much more research to be done in this area.

Are there solutions?

There are many ways to help alleviate the problem of plastic accumulation in the world’s oceans. We need to DO NO MORE HARM, and stop the flow of waste into our marine environment. Some ways to help:

No one solution is the answer, and there are many more ideas yet to come that will generate a whole new set of solutions. We believe human creativity, changes in habits, and technological developments will eventually result in our oceans being clean again.

Can’t we clean up the plastic in the Gyre?

To clean the Gyre poses a whole new set of issues and obstacles, therefore we feel the present focus should be on preventing further accumulation of polluting materials in the oceans. Think of how difficult it would be to gather confetti from along a stretch of beach. Now imagine the area you are trying to clean is not only miles long, but also miles deep. Plastic debris occurs throughout the water column……some of it floats, some swirls below the surface at various depths and some has already sunk to the sea floor. All the while, more and more trash is entering the area. While some of the plastic debris is large enough to be scooped out, much of it consists of tiny fragments. Although cleaning the ocean today appears to be impractical, we embrace the creativity of those trying to solve this problem. Some of these new ideas may not only help clean up the ocean, but be applicable to the waterways entering the ocean, or be appropriate to use further up the watershed. It seems more practical to not only use some of these new ideas to help clean the ocean, but to adapt them to the waterways entering the ocean from further up the watershed, thus preventing further accumulation downstream.

How does this affect me? Is my health at risk?

There is more research needed in this area. There are questions about exactly how plastic pollution transfers pollutants associated with that plastic into the marine environment. Not enough is known about what toxins accumulate. We are not sure how much plastic is ingested by fish, for example, and what affects the pollutants have on fish, and the entire food chain. We are fearful that toxins absorbed by fish through the ingestion of plastic is already beginning to rise within the food chain, and more research on that topic is needed.

What are the next steps on Algalita’s Agenda?

Priorities for our land-based researchers include an ongoing project examining the role of plastics in transporting POPs. Biologists with AMRI are currently studying fish from the Pacific Ocean to determine the type and amount of plastic ingested and analyze both the fish and plastics consumed for contaminants. We are analyzing samples of Albatross (by-catch of the fishing industry) from the Pacific for plastic consumption and contamination. Additional work is yet to be done on the characterization of trawl samples from previous Pacific Gyre voyages, as well as future Pacific, Atlantic and Indian Ocean voyages. Another project planned will examine the presence of plastic in coastal sediments, and potential contaminants associated with those samples.

Please refer to our Research Page for more information.

UPDATED June 3, 2009